Upland Sheep Farming Fights Climate Change: The Science

For decades, the message has been simple: livestock produce methane, methane warms the planet, therefore fewer sheep equals climate action. For upland farmers stewarding Britain's iconic moorlands, this narrative has felt like an accusation.

But what if focusing solely on what comes out of the animal means we're missing what's happening beneath their feet?

Research reveals that extensive sheep grazing - when managed correctly - isn't destroying the climate. It's protecting a hidden cooling system we can't afford to lose.

The Hidden Power Under Our Boots

Upland soils are doing something extraordinary that most carbon calculators completely ignore: they're eating methane straight from the atmosphere.

Nature's Methane Vacuum

Healthy moorland soils host specialized bacteria called high-affinity methanotrophs. Think of them as microscopic air purifiers that consume atmospheric methane for energy. They're scrubbing greenhouse gas from the air 24/7, offsetting emissions before they leave the farm boundary.

This isn't theoretical. It's happening right now under properly managed upland grazing.

Why Lowland Farms Lose This Superpower

Intensive agriculture breaks this natural cleaning service. Ploughing destroys bacterial habitats. Chemical fertilizers confuse the methane-eating enzymes, making them target ammonia instead.

The upland advantage? No ploughing. Little to no fertilizer. Soils stay aerated and alive.

These undisturbed soils can oxidize significantly more methane than lowland counterparts - a globally significant ecosystem service that current policy completely overlooks.

The Superfood Effect

Agricultural efficiency has always been measured by speed. How fast can a lamb reach market weight? By that metric, improved ryegrass always wins.

But speed isn't everything. New research shows the "rough" diet of the hills delivers an unexpected climate benefit.

What Heather Does to a Sheep's Gut

The "Forage for CH4nge" project provides hard evidence: what a sheep eats fundamentally changes how much methane it produces.

Upland plants like heather, bilberry, and native grasses contain tannins - natural compounds that slow digestion and inhibit methane-producing microbes. It's similar to human nutrition: a high-fiber, complex diet produces less gas than a sugar-rich one.

A sheep grazing diverse moorland vegetation operates like a finely-tuned engine on premium fuel, not a sputtering one on cheap petrol.

Native Breeds: Small Engines, Big Efficiency

Our native hill breeds aren't just tough. They're metabolically distinct.

Smaller maintenance requirements: A Swaledale ewe needs less energy than a commercial Texel simply to exist.

Active foragers: Native breeds seek out those tannin-rich plants that commercial sheep ignore.

The data is clear: native sheep grazing unimproved moorland produce significantly lower daily methane emissions than those on improved pasture. Far from inefficient, these animals convert low-quality vegetation into protein with a surprisingly small carbon footprint.

The Metrics Problem: We're Using the Wrong Ruler

If soils are scrubbing methane and plants are reducing production, why do official statistics still look bad for sheep?

The answer: we're measuring with the wrong tool.

GWP100 vs. Reality

Current carbon footprints use GWP100 (Global Warming Potential over 100 years), which treats methane like CO2 - assuming it accumulates in the atmosphere for centuries.

It doesn't. Methane breaks down in about 12 years.

Enter GWP*: The Game-Changer

Climate physicists developed GWP* (pronounced GWP-Star) to reflect how methane actually behaves. Here's what it reveals:

Stable flocks aren't adding to warming. A sheep flock that's been the same size for decades maintains a constant temperature contribution. It's not adding new heat like a coal power plant.

Small reductions create active cooling. When we reduce emissions even slightly - through heather grazing or genetic selection - the system can have a negative warming impact. Upland farmers can actually induce cooling, reversing historical warming effects.

This is the narrative flip: our hills aren't just a problem to manage. They're a potential cooling asset.

The Policy Fix: Stop the One-Size-Fits-All Approach

Recent policy has pushed a simple solution: rewet everything. Block drains, create bogs, store carbon.

Restoring damaged peat is vital. But blanket approaches miss critical nuance.

The Rewetting Trade-Off

Rewetting deep peat stops CO2 loss - but restarts methane production. Waterlogged soils become anaerobic, killing our methane-eating bacteria and activating methane-producing ones.

For deep peat, this trade-off makes sense. For shallower, drier soils? It's environmental self-sabotage.

The Mosaic Strategy

We need precision, not dogma:

Protect deep peat through rewetting. These areas should become carbon stores.

Keep dry heathlands grazed. Maintain the aerated soil structure that houses methane-eating bacteria. Prevent scrub encroachment that destroys the ecosystem.

Reduce wildfire risk. Managed grazing reduces fuel loads, preventing catastrophic carbon release.

The future isn't choosing between farming and nature. It's using livestock as a precision tool to maintain a mosaic landscape - rewetting where appropriate, grazing where beneficial.

What This Means for Upland Farming

The demonization of upland farming rests on incomplete data.

When we examine the whole ecosystem - soil, vegetation, adapted animals - a different picture emerges. Upland sheep farming, done right, is carbon custodianship.

The Path Forward

Government schemes like the Sustainable Farming Incentive and Landscape Recovery already provide mechanisms to reward these ecosystem services. Farmers maintaining the "roughness" of the hills and managing soil health deliver measurable public benefits.

This isn't charity. It's payment for quantifiable climate services that have been invisible too long.

A Message to Upland Farmers

With your native breeds and carefully managed soils, you're guardians of a complex carbon cycle that - when managed correctly - actively fights climate change.

The science now backs what you've known all along: these hills, and the farming that shapes them, matter.

Take Action

For farmers: Explore SFI and Landscape Recovery funding that rewards climate-smart grazing management.

For policymakers: Demand carbon accounting that reflects GWP* and includes soil methane sinks.

For everyone: Share this evidence. Challenge the incomplete narrative. Support upland farming that delivers for climate, nature, and communities.

The upland story deserves to be told accurately. It's time the science caught up with the landscape.

Stay Updated

📧 Keep updated on all moorland issues - sign up for our FREE weekly newsletter.